• Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Contact Us (317) 692-9000

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Directions

Kroger Gardis Regas, LLP

Kroger Gardis & Regas, LLP

  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
You are here: Home / Employment Law / Personnel Decisions:  Don’t We Have To Treat All Employees “The Same?”

Personnel Decisions:  Don’t We Have To Treat All Employees “The Same?”

February 7, 2018 //  by Joseph Pettygrove

No.  You really don’t.  Not in an absolute sense anyway.  Under most equal employment opportunity or workplace civil rights laws, you need to treat similarly situated people similarly.  That doesn’t mean “identical always in all ways.”  Employees rightly expect consistency and everyone naturally feels that prior situations involving leave, discipline, termination, pay, etc. “set precedents.” So it’s wise to strive for consistency as a general goal.  But there are plenty of legitimate and non-discriminatory reasons – including the passage of time and accompanying changes in business, financial, or other operational circumstances – that may justify treating one employee “differently” than you’ve treated others in the past.  Of course, any reason(s) for “differential” treatment must be verifiably true, business-related, and unrelated to the employee’s legally protected status or conduct.  In addition, such reasons should be well and carefully documented.  While each situation is unique, here are some “differentiators” that may justify treating a given employee differently from others

  • Temporary regular employee status
  • The employee engaged in a different type or degree of misconduct compared to others (assaulting a coworker is different than tardiness!)
  • Supervisor v. non-supervisory status
    (shouldn’t you hold leaders to a higher standard?)
  • Intervening change in applicable policies/processes
    (preferably documented)
  • Prior disciplinary history (or LACK thereof)
  • In discharge/discipline decisions, strength (or lack) of
    evidence of policy violation or other wrongdoing
  • In hire/promotion decisions, strength (or lack) of prior,
    relevant experience or education
  • Materially different job duties, functions or expectations
  • Other “mitigating” or “aggravating” factors

Everyone wants and deserves to be treated “fairly,” but that doesn’t mean being treated “identically.”  And making a knee-jerk decision to approach personnel decisions “the way we did it in the past” often is not what’s truly best for business.  Don’t differentiate in employee treatment based on protected categories, but DO differentiate based on conduct, performance, and other legitimate job-related factors.  And be sure to make appropriate records of your decision-making process!

Courtesy of Joe Pettygrove

  • jpettygrove@kgrlaw.com ● @HoosierHRLawyer ● 

Category: Blog, Employment LawTag: Joseph Pettygrove

Previous Post: « Mortgaged Property Sold at Tax Sale – What’s a Lender to do?
Next Post: Dismissal of Inverse Condemnation Pleadings Premature »

Primary Sidebar

If you are interested in our services please fill out the form below.

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone (required)

    Subject

    Your Message

    RECENT POSTS

    Practical Legal Issues regarding Vaping and Schools

    The tobacco use intervention strategies of the past may have low …

    The Federal Trade Commission Announced a Ban on Non-Compete Agreements: What Does That Mean for Your Business?

    We won’t bury the lede: it could be huge, but it’s also probably …

    2 New Attorneys, 1 Paralegal Join KGR

    KGR is thrilled to start the New Year with two new attorneys Wes …

    KGR Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against City of Bloomington in Free Speech Case

    Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and its local chapter on the Indiana …

    KGR Attorneys File Lawsuit Against USA Track & Field to Advance Athlete Health & Safety

    KGR’s Sports and Entertainment Law Team, led by KGR Partner Bill …

    Footer

    Indianapolis Office

    Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP

    111 Monument Circle, Suite 900 Indianapolis, IN 46204

    (317) 692-9000
    (317) 264-6832
    Directions

    Connect with us!

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter

    Newsletter

    Select list(s) to subscribe to


    By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP, 111 Monument Circle, Indianapolis, IN, 46204, http://www.kgrlaw.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

    Copyright © 2023 · Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP · Log in