• Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Contact Us (317) 692-9000

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Directions

Kroger Gardis Regas, LLP

Educational Resources

  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • Meritas
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Lenders’ Handbook of Loan Enforcement
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • Meritas
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Lenders’ Handbook of Loan Enforcement
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Should non-dischargeability of student loan debt be subject to arbitration?

Should non-dischargeability of student loan debt be subject to arbitration?

December 12, 2018 //  by Melissa McCarty

While it is possible to discharge student loan debt in a bankruptcy proceeding, a debtor seeking to do so has to show the Bankruptcy Court that repaying the loan would create “an undue hardship.”

This can be a very big hurdle.

And lenders are now attempting to create another impediment: mandatory arbitration provisions.  Such provisions require the student loan borrower to submit any claim arising under the note to arbitration.

Although some bankruptcy judges have been persuaded by the lenders’ claims that arbitration provisions are applicable to whether the debt is dischargeable under the Bankruptcy Code. Bankruptcy Judge Jeffrey J. Graham of the Southern District of Indiana Bankruptcy Court is not among them.

Judge Graham recently denied a lender’s motion to compel arbitration as to whether a student loan was dischargeable as an undue hardship pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(8).  The order, entered on November 16, 2018 in In Re.: Mathew Richard Roth, Case 18-50087, articulated two reasons for the denial.  First, compelling arbitration within a bankruptcy proceeding is contradictory to the Code, the primary purpose of which is to give the debtor a fresh start. “The primary tool for effectuating a debtor’s fresh start is the discharge.” Requiring arbitration would remove this “essential function of bankruptcy law from bankruptcy courts.”  Permitting parties to opt out of the bankruptcy process would permit them “to contractually overrule the application of federal bankruptcy law”, and specifically the discharge provisions of the Code.  Second, Judge Graham wrote that having all of a debtor’s obligations determined promptly and efficiently by the bankruptcy court is “a pillar of federal bankruptcy law.”  Allowing arbitration of one debt, when other debts are not subject to arbitration, would be “inefficient, costly and time consuming.”

Judge Graham concluded that arbitrating a dischargeability dispute as to student loan debt is inconsistent with the purpose of the Bankruptcy Code, and he declined to enforce the arbitration provision in the student loan promissory note.

If you have questions about what debts can be discharged in bankruptcy or require assistance prosecuting or defending an adversary proceeding, contact one of our attorneys for guidance. Harley Means, James Knauer, and Melissa De Groff.

Please use the following link to view the Order Denying Motion to Compel

Category: UncategorizedTag: Melissa McCarty

Previous Post: « Business and Commercial Cases of Interest to Professionals
Next Post: Contract disputes remain most common problem in construction »

Primary Sidebar

If you are interested in our services please fill out the form below.

RECENT POSTS

Indiana Leadership Foundation from the perspective of a KGR Associate

Leadership, Service, and Perspective

Reflections on My Indiana Leadership Forum Experience Last …

Women in Sports

Women in Sports: Ensuring Opportunity, Fairness and Safety

U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing September 23, …

A Human-Focused Approach to Professional Growth

Count the People in Your Day Think back over yesterday, but …

KGR Celebrates Attorneys Named to 2027 Best Lawyers in America List

The KGR family is incredibly proud of our attorneys recognized …

Governor Braun Appoints Ted Nolting to Marion County Judicial Selection Committee

Kroger, Gardis & Regas is proud to announce that Governor …

Footer

Indianapolis Office

Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP

111 Monument Circle, Suite 900 Indianapolis, IN 46204

(317) 692-9000
(317) 264-6832
Directions

Connect with us!

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2026 · Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP · Log in