• Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Contact Us (317) 692-9000

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Directions

Kroger Gardis Regas, LLP

Kroger Gardis & Regas, LLP

  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Should non-dischargeability of student loan debt be subject to arbitration?

Should non-dischargeability of student loan debt be subject to arbitration?

December 12, 2018 //  by Melissa De Groff

While it is possible to discharge student loan debt in a bankruptcy proceeding, a debtor seeking to do so has to show the Bankruptcy Court that repaying the loan would create “an undue hardship.”

This can be a very big hurdle.

And lenders are now attempting to create another impediment: mandatory arbitration provisions.  Such provisions require the student loan borrower to submit any claim arising under the note to arbitration.

Although some bankruptcy judges have been persuaded by the lenders’ claims that arbitration provisions are applicable to whether the debt is dischargeable under the Bankruptcy Code. Bankruptcy Judge Jeffrey J. Graham of the Southern District of Indiana Bankruptcy Court is not among them.

Judge Graham recently denied a lender’s motion to compel arbitration as to whether a student loan was dischargeable as an undue hardship pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(8).  The order, entered on November 16, 2018 in In Re.: Mathew Richard Roth, Case 18-50087, articulated two reasons for the denial.  First, compelling arbitration within a bankruptcy proceeding is contradictory to the Code, the primary purpose of which is to give the debtor a fresh start. “The primary tool for effectuating a debtor’s fresh start is the discharge.” Requiring arbitration would remove this “essential function of bankruptcy law from bankruptcy courts.”  Permitting parties to opt out of the bankruptcy process would permit them “to contractually overrule the application of federal bankruptcy law”, and specifically the discharge provisions of the Code.  Second, Judge Graham wrote that having all of a debtor’s obligations determined promptly and efficiently by the bankruptcy court is “a pillar of federal bankruptcy law.”  Allowing arbitration of one debt, when other debts are not subject to arbitration, would be “inefficient, costly and time consuming.”

Judge Graham concluded that arbitrating a dischargeability dispute as to student loan debt is inconsistent with the purpose of the Bankruptcy Code, and he declined to enforce the arbitration provision in the student loan promissory note.

If you have questions about what debts can be discharged in bankruptcy or require assistance prosecuting or defending an adversary proceeding, contact one of our attorneys for guidance. Harley Means, James Knauer, and Melissa De Groff.

Please use the following link to view the Order Denying Motion to Compel

Category: UncategorizedTag: Melissa De Groff

Previous Post: « Contract disputes remain most common problem in construction
Next Post: Business and Commercial Cases of Interest to Professionals »

Primary Sidebar

If you are interested in our services please fill out the form below.

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone (required)

    Subject

    Your Message

    RECENT POSTS

    Choices, Choices: Estate Planning & Creating a Will

    Sometimes, making choices is difficult, either because we have …

    Mandates Involving DCS

    If you suspect a student is experiencing abuse or neglect, you …

    Work From Home: 3 HR Tips for Businesses

    The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted employees and employers alike …

    What to Know: Mechanic’s Lien

    Scenario: What if you are hired to do work at a construction …

    Meet Our Firm: Melissa Hamer-Bailey

    Q&A with Melissa Hamer-Bailey, associate Why did you become …

    Footer

    Indianapolis Office

    Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP

    111 Monument Circle, Suite 900 Indianapolis, IN 46204

    (317) 692-9000
    (317) 264-6832
    Directions

    Connect with us!

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter

    Newsletter

    Select list(s) to subscribe to


    By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP, 111 Monument Circle, Indianapolis, IN, 46204, http://www.kgrlaw.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

    Copyright © 2022 · Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP · Log in