• Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Contact Us (317) 692-9000

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Directions

Kroger Gardis Regas, LLP

Kroger Gardis & Regas, LLP

  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
You are here: Home / Corporate Law / Documenting and follow-up for the investigation

Documenting and follow-up for the investigation

October 7, 2016 //  by Steve Runyan

Steve-Runyan-Web-BlogIn a prior posts, we wrote about why you may need an internal investigation, who should conduct the investigation, and the planning and conduct of the investigation. In this post, we will discuss documenting and following-up on the investigation.

Documenting the investigation is crucial – the work isn’t done until the paperwork is completed.  You must evaluate the facts you discovered and determine the merits of the complaint. Segregate the facts into disputed and undisputed facts.  Can you reach a decision solely by looking at the undisputed facts?  If so, you do not need to move forward and consider the disputed facts. Review the witness statements and determine whether the statements were consistent. Where inconsistencies exist, consider whether a witness had any reason to be less than truthful. Do documents support one side or the other? In assessing the credibility of the statements, consider additional factors such as prior incidents that may reflect on credibility, the witnesses’ motives, demeanor and plausibility.  Generally, you will find that when conflicting evidence exists, one version of the events is more plausible than the other.  If does not mean that the less plausible version could not happen, only that it is less likely.

After you have gathered and examined the facts and reached your conclusion, have someone else review the facts and conclusions.  A fresh set of eyes will point out missing evidence, conclusions not supported by the evidence, and may have alternative conclusions.

Once you have determined what likely happened, you must apply the conclusions to determine if misconduct did in fact occur.  The application will depend on the nature of the alleged misconduct – why you are investigating the complaint.  Are company policies at issue, regulatory requirements, and/or statutes?  Application to the governing rules will determine whether or not you have misconduct (or if the existence of misconduct is unknown).

The finding, conclusions, and application should be reported to the decision makers for action. As to the employees, the accuser must be protected from retaliation, the target may be subject to discipline, and some (or all) employees may need training. Action will take many forms and depends largely on the circumstances. Several factors should be considered: The seriousness and frequency of the conduct; the employment record of the individuals involved; the discipline imposed for other similar actions; and whether other company policies may relate to the situation (such as a policy of progressive disciple). The institution may require the review and modification of general company procedures.

Regardless of what action will be taken, it must be communicated to the complainant so they understand and are prepared for the action to be taken. Details of the investigation results and disciplinary action taken generally should only be provided to those people who need to know. But disclosure of the general nature of the investigation results provides an excellent opportunity to reinforce the employer’s anti-harassment, anti-discrimination, business ethics and other employment policies.

Proper follow-up may also require reporting the results to governmental or regulatory agencies. The intricacies of voluntary disclosures and the impact on regulatory officials is beyond the scope of this article. But generally, voluntary disclosure may result in decreased civil penalties and decreased likelihood of criminal prosecution.  However, the outcome is not guaranteed, and the voluntary disclosure will alert the government to the problem and may involve costs and resources that distract from the institution’s business.

We could not presume to provide a definitive guide on how to document an investigation and apply remedial provisions following the investigation. For a thorough discussion of these issues, or if you have other questions on how to best protect your company, please contact Bill Bock or Steve Runyan of our Investigation and Crisis Management Team, or one of our attorney’s here.  It would be our pleasure to assist you.

Category: Blog, Corporate Law, Ethics Investigations and Crisis ManagementTag: Steven Runyan

Previous Post: « New Overtime Regulations to Take Effect December 1, 2016
Next Post: 11th Hour Federal Court Injunction Blocks New FLSA Overtime Rules »

Primary Sidebar

If you are interested in our services please fill out the form below.

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone (required)

    Subject

    Your Message

    RECENT POSTS

    Practical Legal Issues regarding Vaping and Schools

    The tobacco use intervention strategies of the past may have low …

    The Federal Trade Commission Announced a Ban on Non-Compete Agreements: What Does That Mean for Your Business?

    We won’t bury the lede: it could be huge, but it’s also probably …

    2 New Attorneys, 1 Paralegal Join KGR

    KGR is thrilled to start the New Year with two new attorneys Wes …

    KGR Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against City of Bloomington in Free Speech Case

    Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and its local chapter on the Indiana …

    KGR Attorneys File Lawsuit Against USA Track & Field to Advance Athlete Health & Safety

    KGR’s Sports and Entertainment Law Team, led by KGR Partner Bill …

    Footer

    Indianapolis Office

    Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP

    111 Monument Circle, Suite 900 Indianapolis, IN 46204

    (317) 692-9000
    (317) 264-6832
    Directions

    Connect with us!

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter

    Newsletter

    Select list(s) to subscribe to


    By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP, 111 Monument Circle, Indianapolis, IN, 46204, http://www.kgrlaw.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

    Copyright © 2023 · Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP · Log in