• Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Contact Us (317) 692-9000

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Directions

Kroger Gardis Regas, LLP

Kroger Gardis & Regas, LLP

  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
You are here: Home / Bankruptcy Law / Client Alert: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Opinion on Bankruptcy Jurisdictional Issue

Client Alert: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Opinion on Bankruptcy Jurisdictional Issue

May 27, 2015 //  by KGR

The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion yesterday on whether certain types of cases may be heard in bankruptcy courts.  The Court had previously ruled that bankruptcy courts lacked “constitutional authority” to hear certain types of “core” proceedings involving disputes between a debtor and third parties (so called “Stern” cases named after the case of Stern v. Marshall).  An example of such a case might be where a debtor attempts to recover a transfer it made before filing bankruptcy based on a theory of fraudulent conveyance.  After Stern, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that parties cannot consent to a bankruptcy court deciding these issues, and that the case therefore had to be transferred to a federal district court for proceedings and a decision.

The Court reversed the Seventh Circuit and held that parties can knowingly and voluntarily consent to a bankruptcy court deciding Stern issues in the case of Wellman International v. Sharif.  Read the Court’s Opinion here:  Wellness – Supreme Court opinion – 05 2015

Category: Bankruptcy Law, Blog

Previous Post: « Sports Law Attorney Bill Bock on Deflategate
Next Post: Estate Planning For Parents of a Child With Special Needs »

Primary Sidebar

If you are interested in our services please fill out the form below.

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone (required)

    Subject

    Your Message

    RECENT POSTS

    Estate Planning

    Choices, Choices: Estate Planning & Creating a Will

    Sometimes, making choices is difficult, either because we have …

    Mandates Involving DCS

    If you suspect a student is experiencing abuse or neglect, you …

    Work From Home: 3 HR Tips for Businesses

    The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted employees and employers alike …

    What to Know: Mechanic’s Lien

    Scenario: What if you are hired to do work at a construction …

    Meet Our Firm: Melissa Hamer-Bailey

    Q&A with Melissa Hamer-Bailey, associate Why did you become …

    Footer

    Indianapolis Office

    Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP

    111 Monument Circle, Suite 900 Indianapolis, IN 46204

    (317) 692-9000
    (317) 264-6832
    Directions

    Connect with us!

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter

    Newsletter

    Select list(s) to subscribe to


    By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP, 111 Monument Circle, Indianapolis, IN, 46204, http://www.kgrlaw.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

    Copyright © 2022 · Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP · Log in