• Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Contact Us (317) 692-9000

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Directions

Kroger Gardis Regas, LLP

Kroger Gardis & Regas, LLP

  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
You are here: Home / Bankruptcy Law / Client Alert: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Opinion on Bankruptcy Jurisdictional Issue

Client Alert: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Opinion on Bankruptcy Jurisdictional Issue

May 27, 2015 //  by KGR

The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion yesterday on whether certain types of cases may be heard in bankruptcy courts.  The Court had previously ruled that bankruptcy courts lacked “constitutional authority” to hear certain types of “core” proceedings involving disputes between a debtor and third parties (so called “Stern” cases named after the case of Stern v. Marshall).  An example of such a case might be where a debtor attempts to recover a transfer it made before filing bankruptcy based on a theory of fraudulent conveyance.  After Stern, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that parties cannot consent to a bankruptcy court deciding these issues, and that the case therefore had to be transferred to a federal district court for proceedings and a decision.

The Court reversed the Seventh Circuit and held that parties can knowingly and voluntarily consent to a bankruptcy court deciding Stern issues in the case of Wellman International v. Sharif.  Read the Court’s Opinion here:  Wellness – Supreme Court opinion – 05 2015

Category: Bankruptcy Law, Blog

Previous Post: « Sports Law Attorney Bill Bock on Deflategate
Next Post: Estate Planning For Parents of a Child With Special Needs »

Primary Sidebar

If you are interested in our services please fill out the form below.

RECENT POSTS

Indiana Enacts Additional Restrictions Physician Non-Compete Agreements

The Bottom Line Effective July 1, 2023:  employers …

Video Recordings of Students

Under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), …

KGR is Hiring: Public Relations & Marketing Specialist

Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP is an Indianapolis-based law …

What Happens to Your Social Media Accounts After Your Death?

Estate planning has not always kept up with the pace of change …

7 Attorneys Selected as Super Lawyers 2023

We are thrilled to announce Super Lawyers selected seven KGR …

Footer

Indianapolis Office

Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP

111 Monument Circle, Suite 900 Indianapolis, IN 46204

(317) 692-9000
(317) 264-6832
Directions

Connect with us!

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Newsletter

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP, 111 Monument Circle, Indianapolis, IN, 46204, http://www.kgrlaw.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Copyright © 2023 · Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP · Log in