• Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Contact Us (317) 692-9000

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Directions

Kroger Gardis Regas, LLP

Kroger Gardis & Regas, LLP

  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
You are here: Home / Business Litigation / The “Binding” Letter of Intent, Corporate Acquisition Strategy Via Litigation
contract

The “Binding” Letter of Intent, Corporate Acquisition Strategy Via Litigation

May 29, 2017 //  by David Wright

KGR helped the client enter into a “binding letter of intent (LOI)” with minority shareholders to purchase the minority shares of company.  The goal was to acquire the entire target company by enforcing the shareholder agreement rights and obligations.    The shareholder agreement contained various triggers for compelling the sale of shares, or the right to purchase shares.  The majority shareholder also happened to be terminally ill with serious health and potential capacity issues, thus certain corporate avoidance actions were subject to attack.  The successful litigation strategy was based on strict interpretation and enforcement of the shareholder agreement and enforcement of the LOI as a binding unconditional minority shareholder contract, not a mere conditional statement of intent.  The result was an industry impacting business resolution and the acquisition of the target company via the LOI strategy and contract enforcement strategies. For a thorough discussion of these issues, or if you have other questions regarding your minority shareholders rights, please contact David Wright and Kevin Koons, or one of our other attorneys here to discuss your situation. It would be our pleasure to assist you.

Category: Blog, Business LitigationTag: David Wright

Previous Post: «construction at sunset Construction Projects and Surety Bonds
Next Post: Arbitration is Not a One Size Fits All Solution »

Primary Sidebar

If you are interested in our services please fill out the form below.

RECENT POSTS

Navigating Indiana’s New Career Pathways Law

The landscape of high school education in Indiana is shifting. …

2023 Indiana Education Legislative Update

Seasoned legislators have already called this session one of the …

Indiana Enacts Additional Restrictions for Physician Non-Compete Agreements

The Bottom Line Effective July 1, 2023:  employers …

Video Recordings of Students

Under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), …

What Happens to Your Social Media Accounts After Your Death?

Estate planning has not always kept up with the pace of change …

Footer

Indianapolis Office

Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP

111 Monument Circle, Suite 900 Indianapolis, IN 46204

(317) 692-9000
(317) 264-6832
Directions

Connect with us!

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 · Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP · Log in