• Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Contact Us (317) 692-9000

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Directions

Kroger Gardis Regas, LLP

Kroger Gardis & Regas, LLP

  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Firm
    • About Us
    • History
    • KGR in Our Community
    • TAGLaw®
  • Professionals
  • Practice Areas
  • Information
    • Blog
    • Doing Business in Indiana: A Reference Guide
    • Representing Buyers and Sellers in Acquisitions of Privately Held Companies
    • Receiverships & Class Actions
  • Legal Lessons
    • Courses
    • Login
    • Account
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Search
You are here: Home / Arbitration / Arbitration is Not a One Size Fits All Solution

Arbitration is Not a One Size Fits All Solution

June 5, 2017 //  by Steve Runyan

Justice Hart of the Arkansas Supreme Court recently wrote a scathing dissent on the proliferation of arbitration to settle disputes. You can find a story summarizing the dissent here and the full dissent here.

Whether you favor or disfavor the use of arbitration, Justice Hart raises a number of points that attorneys and clients should consider before agreeing to arbitration as a method of dispute resolution.

She notes that arbitration is not often the cost saving resolution touted. She is undoubtedly correct that paying an arbitrator (or panel) is significantly more expensive than the cost of a court where a litigant is only responsible for the filing fee and court costs.  Whether the total cost of arbitration is cheaper or more expensive than traditional litigation depends on the nature of the matter and the scope of discovery undertaken.  Certainly if extensive discovery occurs in traditional litigation but an arbitration panel would have limited the scope of discovery, then you may spend less money through the course of the decision making process.

But that begs the question, do you need the discovery?  If your case hinges on discovery, are you willing to risk that discovery may be limited by the panel?  Further, if you require discovery from a nonparty in traditional litigation, it can generally be compelled through issuance of a subpoena with the discovery. Virtually no additional steps are required. In arbitration however, the panel does not have the power to compel compliance with a non-party discovery request.  Consequently, in order to compel a response, a court action will have to be opened.

Justice Hart also noted the inability for judicial review.  While every litigant expects that it will get the right decision at the trial court level, the appellate courts are busy for a reason.  Mistakes do get made.  In traditional litigation, a litigant can appeal to the appellate court to correct the decision.  In arbitration, not so much. In Indiana, the decision may be vacated only if the award was procured by fraud, there was misconduct or partiality by the arbitrators, the arbitrators exceeded their powers, the arbitrators prejudiced a party by refusing to hear evidence or postpone the hearing despite sufficient cause, or there was no agreement to arbitrate (and the party appealing did not participate without objection).[1] If a litigant thinks the decision maker erred, that alone would not get the decision reversed.[2]  In other words, it is unlikely that an appeal would be successful in the typical case.

There are certainly appropriate times for arbitrations.  Here at our firm, partner Bill Bock has participated in hundreds of arbitrations in the last couple of years on behalf of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA).  But in the vast majority of those cases, the necessary discovery is limited.  And unlike in traditional litigation, procedures are in place for appeals of USADA cases.

All of this is not to say that an arbitration is bad or inappropriate.  There may be a time or place for the arbitration.  But before agreeing to arbitration to resolve a dispute (or a potential dispute), you should understand what you are giving up and what you are getting.  Before you agree to resolve a dispute through arbitration, and before you sign a contract that requires arbitration, be sure to talk to an attorney to make sure your rights are protected.

For a thorough discussion of these issues, or if you have other questions regarding arbitration or litigation, please contact Steve Runyan, Bill Bock, Kevin Koons, or David Wright or one of our other attorneys here to discuss your situation. It would be our pleasure to assist you.

[1] Ind. Code §34-57-2-13.

[2] Awards may be modified if there was an evident miscalculation or reference or if the arbitrators decided an issue not presented to them and that issue can be corrected without affecting the merits.  Ind. Code §34-57-2-14.

Category: Arbitration, BlogTag: appeal, Arbitration, attorney fees, Award, David Wright, Kevin Koons, litigation, Steven Runyan, William Bock

Previous Post: «contract The “Binding” Letter of Intent, Corporate Acquisition Strategy Via Litigation
Next Post: Shareholder Rights, Minority Shareholder Oppression minority shareholder»

Primary Sidebar

If you are interested in our services please fill out the form below.

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone (required)

    Subject

    Your Message

    RECENT POSTS

    Practical Legal Issues regarding Vaping and Schools

    The tobacco use intervention strategies of the past may have low …

    The Federal Trade Commission Announced a Ban on Non-Compete Agreements: What Does That Mean for Your Business?

    We won’t bury the lede: it could be huge, but it’s also probably …

    2 New Attorneys, 1 Paralegal Join KGR

    KGR is thrilled to start the New Year with two new attorneys Wes …

    KGR Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against City of Bloomington in Free Speech Case

    Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and its local chapter on the Indiana …

    KGR Attorneys File Lawsuit Against USA Track & Field to Advance Athlete Health & Safety

    KGR’s Sports and Entertainment Law Team, led by KGR Partner Bill …

    Footer

    Indianapolis Office

    Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP

    111 Monument Circle, Suite 900 Indianapolis, IN 46204

    (317) 692-9000
    (317) 264-6832
    Directions

    Connect with us!

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter

    Newsletter

    Select list(s) to subscribe to


    By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP, 111 Monument Circle, Indianapolis, IN, 46204, http://www.kgrlaw.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

    Copyright © 2023 · Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP · Log in